Local Constraint Market
We are now trialling a new Local Constraint Market (LCM) to access new sources of flexibility to help manage one of our most constrained boundaries.
The anticipated growth in renewable generation in Scotland is increasing power transfer across the Scottish boundaries, which are forecast to increase constraints at or above the B6 boundary and ultimately costs to the end consumer.
The B6 boundary separates the transmission network at the SP Transmission and National Grid Transmission interface running roughly along the border between Scotland and England.
We have committed as part of the NESO 5-point plan to deliver a Local Constraint Market to help tackle the rising constraint costs at the B6 boundary.
Taking the learnings from the delivery of the Optional Downward Flexibility Management (ODFM) service, we’re keen to develop a market that facilitates access to new providers of flexibility and provide competition to the Balancing Mechanism – our existing market for the majority of transmission constraint management.
We have now contracted a 3rd party platform provider to manage the end-to-end process and provide engagement and information for our flex providers.
10 October 2024: Ofgem gives green light to ABSVD Opt-Out solution for Non-BM providers
NESO are pleased to announce an innovative solution that tackles a significant challenge faced by non-BM providers participating in the interim LCM service. The ABSVD revision 2.04 report to the Authority has highlighted a transformative opportunity that affects the economic incentives for customers engaging in the LCM via third-party providers.
The current issue revolves around an area of optimization within the LCM process. This situation reduces the economic benefits for customers utilizing third-party providers within the LCM, resulting in limited savings and a potential lack of active volume.
To address this optimization opportunity, we propose introducing a price adjustment mechanism that allows Demand Turn Up and Generation Turn Down providers to "opt out" of ABSVD for qualifying Meter Point Administration Numbers (MPANs). This solution, previously considered in the annual review of C16 statements conducted in Q1 2024, aims to provide an alternative to ABSVD and overcome the challenges faced by non-BM providers for the life cycle of the LCM service.
By implementing this solution, we anticipate an increase in volume within the LCM, resulting in greater constraint savings across the B6/B4 boundaries. These savings should directly benefit consumers by reducing costs and ensuring a more efficient energy market.
We are committed to fostering a fair and competitive market environment. By allowing providers to "opt out" of ABSVD for qualifying MPANs, we aim to create a level playing field for all participants and encourage greater engagement in the LCM.
We are confident that our proposed solution will address the optimization opportunity and enhance the benefits of the LCM for non-BM providers. Learn more about this information on the Ofgem Website and see how you can register your assets.
Keep an eye out for more updates on this exciting development. If you have any questions or would like further information, please don't hesitate to reach out to us.
Following internal review considering all the provider feedback received, we can formally communicate that Asset Level Metering will now be allowed in the LCM service without the need for Boundary Point Metering. LCM is a time-limited service scheduled to end late 2025, and as such provides the opportunity to explore ways to increase participation in markets at a low risk.
The decision on metering rules for LCM has been taken with other services in mind and an impact assessment has been considered. The allowance of Asset Metering in LCM will not set a precedent for other current or future services. We want to be clear that the decisive factors for this change are the direction (Demand Turn Up), low volumes and short time frame which collectively mean the risks have been evaluated as minimal.
The gaming risks are much lower than a relative DtD (Demand Turn Down) service, owing to the different incentives – we believe the risk of attempting to game additional usage in LCM to be very low (for example charging an EV from a home battery and only declaring the home battery into LCM) with the low/free pricing for consumers there would be little to no benefit.
However, for a larger volume DtD service, there is sizable potential benefit available to the end consumer (for example charging an EV via a domestic socket rather than a dedicated charger during a DtD window, and only entering the EV charger into service) given the volume and prices are forecast to be significantly higher than LCM in those DtD services.
For users wishing to submit their asset level data they will do so at the baseline / settlement stages using the existing process and will still be required to upload boundary meter ID (MPAN) in the asset qualification stage.
We will continue to keep this under review as learnings from LCM will be a beneficial part of this process.
Thank you to all our stakeholders for supporting the ongoing final stages of Local Constraint Market (LCM) trials.
Market trials - From today, the LCM trials will only consider bids for acceptance which enable LCM to be more cost effective than the Balancing Mechanism (BM). In line with operational conditions, only bids that deliver savings against the BM can be dispatched.
LCM transparency report on BM Pricing in Scotland - We have listened to LCM provider queries about the present BM actions and what it would take for the LCM to make savings for the end-consumer. We've responded, and draw your attention to our new FAQ and a sample of BM prices on selected days since 2020 when Scottish (B6/B4) constraints were more active. It is aimed at LCM stakeholders, and includes answers to questions such as:
- BM data can be complex to analyse. What prices do our assets try to beat?
- Can you clarify what ESO needs to be able to make consumer savings?
The FAQ and report can be found under "sample of Scotland constraint BM prices" in the document library tab on this page. A list of contacts are given for more information in the FAQ.
Thank you to all who have registered for trials. The competition to qualify assets is now open, and you can still register for early trials. Go to PicloFlex below to see the regions for LCM Trials, and click on LCM Qualification to get details and access the Service Terms.
Thank you to all LCM stakeholders who are considering joining in the new Local Constraint Market. Please find a Q&A summary of how we responded to market feedback and continue to develop the new service.
Trials are now under way with our 3rd party platform provider Piclo leading the onboarding, registration and asset qualification process.
If you can participate in our trials ongoing through Q2 please register to get information on LCM provided by Piclo.
If you have registered with Piclo and still have questions after reviewing the materials, please email us using the link below.
Consultation documents
If you are a stakeholder for the service and still have questions our LCM platform provider cannot help you with, please email David Phillips, Market Change Delivery team: [email protected].
Sample of Scotland constraint BM prices
The two documents below should be read together - please review the FAQ before the "Scottish B6-B4 constraint BM price points 2020-23" document. The purpose is to provide new entrants to the emerging LCM market with improved historical information.
As the LCM in Scotland is new, we are provisionally offering some data on past BM constraint actions to help LCM providers to compete with the substantial volumes already available at BM prices.
This is a provisional sample of past data. As a prudent operator, the ESO must take into account many factors in determining the most appropriate markets, units and actions.
This shows the potential catchment areas for the Local Constraints Market in Scotland.
The two areas show how assets at different locations can register to ease constraints each the SCOTEX (B6) and more northern SSE-SP2 (B4) boundaries:
- Both areas - the northern, pink-shaded and southern (white) areas - can ease SCOTEX
- When only the northern SSE-SP2 boundary is constrained, only the northern pink areas can bid into competitions to ease this boundary.
Previous events
Watch the recorded presentations from the event by pressing the play icon on each image or download material from each session using the link below each image.
We have updated updated our Q&A document, which now includes all your questions from the webinar on 16 January.
Futures and fairer access webinar - 16 January 2024
On 16 January we hosted the futures and fairer access webinar, where we gave an update on the service progress to date, future opportunities with the service, and ending with a Q&A session.
Further enquiries
Get in touch with the right team within Balancing Services, who are on hand to answer any questions you may have.